http://thecommonsenseshow.com/2013/09/02/the-us-military-fears-war-with-syria/
Over 90% of the American people do not want Obama to attack Syria. The top military leadership in this country have also advised against this fool’s errand and the rank and file of military does not respect Obama, nor do they want to follow him down the path of destruction.
The following people, pictured below, and the criminal bankers that they represent, are the only ones that are itching for a fight with Syria. Below are the faces of the people who will soon become the world’s next war criminals.
On Sunday, Secretary of State John Kerry said the U.S. received new physical evidence in the form of blood and hair samples that show sarin gas was used in the August 21 attack. To Mr. Kerry, I would say that nobody that is credible is disputing the use of sarin gas in Damascus. What is at issue is who perpetrated these attacks, al-Qaeda or Assad? Since Assad had nothing to gain from the use of the chemical agents except to invite Western military intervention, the perpetrator was undoubtedly the CIA backed al-Qaeda.
The fact that Secretary of State, John Kerry, said that the U.S. must respond because its “credibility on the line.” Really, Mr. Kerry, we have to attack Syria, kill tens of thousands of innocent civilians all because your administration’s credibility is on the line? Where do reckless statements, such as these, cross over the line from abject stupidity and enter into the realm of casting this administration as a regime which commits war crimes against the helpless? If this administration attacks the innocent people in Syria, that is precisely what the responsible people will become, war criminals.................
Knowing that an unwarranted American military attack is inevitable, military officials have stated that Assad has responded by moving his assets such as military helicopters, tanks as well as heavy artillery pieces around the country, thus forcing the U.S. to reconfigure the use of cruise missiles and air strikes over a wider range of territory. Further, this does not totally mitigate the nearly 700 SCUD missiles that Assad has pointed at Israel. If Syria is attacked, it is clear that Israel will also be attacked, by Syria, and this when events could quickly spin out of control and lead to a much wider conflict.
If Obama sticks with targeting a well-defined set of military and intelligence assets, then the wider dispersal range of the cruise-missile strikes, will subsequently create a much greater loss of innocent civilian lives. This will not deter a psychopath like Obama..........
It is so clear that taking out Assad is only a means to an end which is to use Syria as a launching pad from which to conduct a regime change in Iran and thus, save the almighty Petrodollar. Everything else is just theater.
The rank and file of the military is speaking out against Obama’s war mongering ways. I have been inundated with communications from active duty personnel which strongly indicate that they are opposed to war in Syria. The military has crossed an imaginary line in the sand with regard to resisting Obama’s insane foreign policies. The military used to accept their mission without question. However, with the slaughter millions in Iraq and the US military forced to guard the heroin shipments by al-Qaeda in Afghanistan, the military has had enough. The disdain of the military for the failed policies of this administration also explains why, last fall, we witnessed two senior command officers, General Hamm and Admiral Gayoutte, attempt to rescue Ambassador Stevens in violation of Obama’s orders to stand down and to let the Ambassador be murdered by al-Qaeda. At the time, I called the event an attempted coup against the President and if these two officers had rescued Ambassador Stevens, Obama would have had his hands full with even more acts of insubordination by military personnel and Obama would have likely faced impeachment before 2012 election. And let us not forget the debacle of the removal of General McChrystal as the commanding general in Afghanistan because of his negative statements about Obama’s leadership as reported by Michael Hastings.
Obama has changed military leadership more than most people change their underwear. The military has had enough of the bankster driven goals which are serving to undermine and misuse the military, to the detriment of the American people. I have often written that Obama could very well be the victim of a military coup and when the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff questions Obama’s intentions in Syria and that criticism is public, Obama had better surround himself with more than the Secret Service in order to prevent the long simmering desire for a coup against Obama that is ready to fully come out of the closet.
Last week, I serendipitously watched the 1964 classic movie, Seven Days in May, starring Kirk Douglas and I thought I was watching a news story about today’s strained relationships between senior military command leadership and their President. In the movie, the Joint Chiefs launched an unsuccessful coup against the President. Today, I think a coup could and would succeed. I believe that Syria will be this President’s Waterloo if he prosecutes this war. However, how many people must die before the military comes to their senses and arrests Obama for treason and crimes against humanity?
The topic of a military coup is a slippery slope and is profoundly distasteful to me because military coups usually lead to a military dictatorship and that frightens me almost as much as the Obama presidency. However, Obama’s presidency is unsustainable and he must be removed from office, hopefully through the impeachment process as initiated by Congress. Obama’s complicity in the death of Ambassador Stevens would be an appropriate place to begin the impeachment process.
Over 90% of the American people do not want Obama to attack Syria. The top military leadership in this country have also advised against this fool’s errand and the rank and file of military does not respect Obama, nor do they want to follow him down the path of destruction.
The following people, pictured below, and the criminal bankers that they represent, are the only ones that are itching for a fight with Syria. Below are the faces of the people who will soon become the world’s next war criminals.
On Sunday, Secretary of State John Kerry said the U.S. received new physical evidence in the form of blood and hair samples that show sarin gas was used in the August 21 attack. To Mr. Kerry, I would say that nobody that is credible is disputing the use of sarin gas in Damascus. What is at issue is who perpetrated these attacks, al-Qaeda or Assad? Since Assad had nothing to gain from the use of the chemical agents except to invite Western military intervention, the perpetrator was undoubtedly the CIA backed al-Qaeda.
The fact that Secretary of State, John Kerry, said that the U.S. must respond because its “credibility on the line.” Really, Mr. Kerry, we have to attack Syria, kill tens of thousands of innocent civilians all because your administration’s credibility is on the line? Where do reckless statements, such as these, cross over the line from abject stupidity and enter into the realm of casting this administration as a regime which commits war crimes against the helpless? If this administration attacks the innocent people in Syria, that is precisely what the responsible people will become, war criminals.................
Knowing that an unwarranted American military attack is inevitable, military officials have stated that Assad has responded by moving his assets such as military helicopters, tanks as well as heavy artillery pieces around the country, thus forcing the U.S. to reconfigure the use of cruise missiles and air strikes over a wider range of territory. Further, this does not totally mitigate the nearly 700 SCUD missiles that Assad has pointed at Israel. If Syria is attacked, it is clear that Israel will also be attacked, by Syria, and this when events could quickly spin out of control and lead to a much wider conflict.
If Obama sticks with targeting a well-defined set of military and intelligence assets, then the wider dispersal range of the cruise-missile strikes, will subsequently create a much greater loss of innocent civilian lives. This will not deter a psychopath like Obama..........
It is so clear that taking out Assad is only a means to an end which is to use Syria as a launching pad from which to conduct a regime change in Iran and thus, save the almighty Petrodollar. Everything else is just theater.
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey, has issued a warning to this administration about the folly of a military attack upon Syria. Dempsey wrote last month that,“As we weigh our options, we should be able to conclude with some confidence that use of force will move us toward the intended outcome. Once we take action, we should be prepared for what comes next. Deeper involvement is hard to avoid.” And what would Dempsey be referring to with regard to deeper involvement and the problems that would follow? Dempsey is clearly worried about what comes after an attack upon Syria. He is warning about the possibility of World War III. This is precisely what Dempsey warned Congress about in a letter to the Senate Armed Services Committee. In an interview with ABC News, Dempsey also stated that the lessons of Iraq heavily influenced his beliefs regarding Syria.
The rank and file of the military is speaking out against Obama’s war mongering ways. I have been inundated with communications from active duty personnel which strongly indicate that they are opposed to war in Syria. The military has crossed an imaginary line in the sand with regard to resisting Obama’s insane foreign policies. The military used to accept their mission without question. However, with the slaughter millions in Iraq and the US military forced to guard the heroin shipments by al-Qaeda in Afghanistan, the military has had enough. The disdain of the military for the failed policies of this administration also explains why, last fall, we witnessed two senior command officers, General Hamm and Admiral Gayoutte, attempt to rescue Ambassador Stevens in violation of Obama’s orders to stand down and to let the Ambassador be murdered by al-Qaeda. At the time, I called the event an attempted coup against the President and if these two officers had rescued Ambassador Stevens, Obama would have had his hands full with even more acts of insubordination by military personnel and Obama would have likely faced impeachment before 2012 election. And let us not forget the debacle of the removal of General McChrystal as the commanding general in Afghanistan because of his negative statements about Obama’s leadership as reported by Michael Hastings.
Obama has changed military leadership more than most people change their underwear. The military has had enough of the bankster driven goals which are serving to undermine and misuse the military, to the detriment of the American people. I have often written that Obama could very well be the victim of a military coup and when the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff questions Obama’s intentions in Syria and that criticism is public, Obama had better surround himself with more than the Secret Service in order to prevent the long simmering desire for a coup against Obama that is ready to fully come out of the closet.
Last week, I serendipitously watched the 1964 classic movie, Seven Days in May, starring Kirk Douglas and I thought I was watching a news story about today’s strained relationships between senior military command leadership and their President. In the movie, the Joint Chiefs launched an unsuccessful coup against the President. Today, I think a coup could and would succeed. I believe that Syria will be this President’s Waterloo if he prosecutes this war. However, how many people must die before the military comes to their senses and arrests Obama for treason and crimes against humanity?
The topic of a military coup is a slippery slope and is profoundly distasteful to me because military coups usually lead to a military dictatorship and that frightens me almost as much as the Obama presidency. However, Obama’s presidency is unsustainable and he must be removed from office, hopefully through the impeachment process as initiated by Congress. Obama’s complicity in the death of Ambassador Stevens would be an appropriate place to begin the impeachment process.
0 comments:
Post a Comment